Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 26.2% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CATHLEEN KARLSSON Board President
JOHNANNA CHOI Board President
MARISSA FATTORINI Treasurer
ASHLEY DESESSO Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA COOK Artistic Director 9.9% of Rev
KARLA PETRY Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
KARLA PETRY Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
ANDREA COOK Artistic Director 5.9% of Rev
CATHLEEN KARLSSON Board President
JOHNANNA CHOI Board President
MARISSA FATTORINI Treasurer
ASHLEY DESESSO Secretary
JAMIE MCNULTY Board President
CATHLEEN KARLSSON Board President
MARY YEE Treasurer
ELIZABETH RAINHART Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (55 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.