Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 60 Stable Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE MIYAMOTO-DELL'ISOLA Board President
PATRICK RICE Board President
GLADYS HOSHIJO Treasurer
SANDRA LABADIE Board Member
LAUREL LISEZ Board Member
CHRISTOPHER MOORHEAD Board Member
VERONICA NESS Board Member
KATHY SHAW Board Member
EILEEN UEBELACKER Board Member
EVAN UEBELACKER Board Member
WENDY WILHELMI Board Member
JANE MIYAMOTO-DELL'ISOLA Board President
CLAUDIA HUNG VICE PRESIDE
GLADYS HOSHIJO Treasurer
LAUREL LISEZ Board Member
SANDRA LABADIE Board Member
CHRISTOPHER MOORHEAD Board Member
VERONICA NESS Board Member
PATRICK RICE Board Member
KATHY SHAW Board Member
EILEEN UEBELACKER Board Member
EVAN UEBELACKER Board Member
WENDY WILHELMI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (50 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 60 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.