Steady State
"Supports the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra through fundraising, audience development, and promoting music education for youth, fostering music appreciation in the community."
— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALICIA MANIATAKIS | Vice President | — | ||
| JEAN STRICKLAND | Vice President | — | ||
| VAL NOGUCHI | RECORD SECRETAR | — | ||
| MARION HALL | Vice President | — | ||
| DONNA LEE YURI KANTOR | Vice President | — | ||
| ELLEN PERKINS | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN CAMERON | Treasurer | — | ||
| PAM IRWIN | Secretary | — | ||
| JUDY SANNES | TRSR FUND EVENT | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 15 points below the peer median (50 vs. 65).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 30 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.