Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

"Provides professional classical, contemporary, and dramatic ballet performances and training in the Puget Sound area, showcasing both established company dancers and emerging talent."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar

Demonstrated Impact

  • full-length production of 'The Sleeping Beauty'
  • new (Debuts) contemporary and traditional ballet pieces
  • traditional and new ballet and dance pieces
  • invited to perform a contemporary repertoire piece
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
39
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 117.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 35 Fragile Recovery
2011 27.6% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Oleg Gorboulev Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Mara Vinson Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Marilla Sargent Board President
Kelly Hui Secretary
Suzanne Cancler Treasurer
Sylvia Christian Board Member
William C Jones Board Member
Lars Christian Board Member
Derek Thurmer Board Member
Elizabeth Fitzpatrick Board Member
Kara McDermott Board Member
Alicia Kikuchi Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Oleg Gorboulev Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Mara Vinson Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Marilla Sargent Board President
Kelly Hui Secretary
Suzanne Cancler Treasurer
Sylvia Christian Board Member
William C Jones Board Member
Lars Christian Board Member
Derek Thurmer Board Member
Elizabeth Fitzpatrick Board Member
Kara McDermott Board Member
Royce Napolitino Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Oleg Gorboulev Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Mara Vinson Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
William C Jones Board Member
Sally Jongitirat Board Member
Amber Kegley Board Member
Marilla Sargent Board President
Melanie Kuechle Board President
Kelly Hui Secretary
Suzanne Cancler Treasurer
Frank Brettholle Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kelly Hui Board Member
Melanie Kuechle Board Member
Marilla Sargeant Board Member
William C Jones Board President
Sally Jongjitirat Board President
Frank Brettholle Treasurer
Harriet Rose Secretary
Oleg Gorboulev Artistic Director
Mara Vinson Artistic Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (25 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.