Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2020 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 15.5% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG WOMACK Board President
MARY BETH ZUNDO VICE PRESIDE
BETH WOODWARD WOLFE Secretary
TIM BERTHEL Board Member
DICK BRAZDA Board Member
GUIDO ESTEVES Board Member
GENE FOWLER Board Member
BETHANY HAGER Board Member
BRIAN KLETT Board Member
JIM KOUZMANOFF Board Member
MARK LINDVAHL Board Member
MARTH LINDVAHL Board Member
MARI MARNO MARTIN Board Member
DAVE SCHROEDER Board Member
AUTSON SURPRENANT Board Member
JENNIFER SZOTT Board Member
RICKEY WILLIAMS JR Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG WOMACK Board President
BETH WOODWARD WOLFE VICE PRESIDE
MARY BETH ZUNDO Secretary
TIM BERTHEL Board Member
DICK BRAZDA Board Member
DEAN CRANDALL Board Member
GUIDO ESTEVES Board Member
GENE FOWLER Board Member
BETHANY HAGER Board Member
BRIAN KLETT Board Member
JIM KOUZMANOFF Board Member
MARK LINDVAHL Board Member
MARTH LINDVAHL Board Member
MARI MARNO MARTIN Board Member
DAVE SCHROEDER Board Member
AUTSON SURPRENANT Board Member
JENNIFER SZOTT Board Member
RICKEY WILLIAMS JR Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEREMY SWERLING MUSIC DIRECT 10.1% of Rev
CYNTHIA NACCO EXECUTIVE DI 9.6% of Rev
ANDREA TARQUINI OPERATIONS C 5.1% of Rev
MARLA BAUERLE-HILL Board Member
ALEXIS BERGAN-GUZMAN Board Member
ROBERT BOESDORFER Board Member
FRANK BRUNACCI Board Member
DEAN CRANDALL Board Member
ADAM CUMMINGS Board Member
DARREN DUNCAN Board Member
TRAVIS MAINS Board Member
DON MARROW Board President
STEPHEN NACCO Board Member
JASON ROME Board Member
AMY SNYDER Board Member
CANDY UNDERHILL VICE PRESIDE
CHERI WELLER Board Member
GAGE WOMACK Board Member
BETH WOODARD-WOLFE Board Member
ELIZABETH YACOBI Board Member
MARY BETH ZUNDO Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.