Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
25
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 28.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MOIRA OSTRANDER EXECUTIVE DI 14.1% of Rev
AMANDA HAIRSTON Board Member 14.0% of Rev
ANGELA BAIN Board Member
MELANIE BUHIS Board Member
CHRISTIN DEWAR Board Member
KATHERINE EVERHART Secretary
LINDSEY HUBBARD Treasurer
KIM MUMPOWER VICE-PRESIDE
MITCH RAINERO Board Member
CAROL SMITH Board Member
CLARE SNYDER-BRANCH Board Member
BETH STOCKNER Board President
KAREN TILLISON Board Member
LISA WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christian Dewar Dir
Chaz Gallo Dir
Clare Snyder Branch Dir
Kim Mumpower Secretary
Melanie Buhls Board Member
Karen Tillison Board Member
Katherine Everhart Dir
Penny Bruce Board Member
Lindsey Hubbard Treasurer
Frank Goodpasture Board President
Beth Stockner Vice President
Carol Smith Dir

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Penny Bruce Board Member
Clare Snyder Branch Dir
Kim Mumpower Dir
Lindsey Hubbard Board Member
Karen Tillison Board Member
Melanie Buhls Board Member
Carol Smith Treasurer
Kathy Littleford Secretary
Frank Goodpasture Board President
Beth Stockner Vice President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Littleford Secretary
Karen Tillison Vice President
Cary Cooper Dir
Peggy Cooper Board Member
Melanie Buhls Board Member
Penny Bruce Board Member
Frank Goodpasture Board President
Beth Stockner Secretary
Carol Smith Treasurer
Kathy Littleford Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (10 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 46 → 25 over 5 years (declining by 21 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.