Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 10.6% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 15.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 9.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 11.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 13.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 13.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 13.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 14.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 11.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 11.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BLYTHE BARTON Board Member —
LONI PALLADINO Secretary —
KEVIN CHARLES PATTERSON Board Member —
DIEGO PINON Board Member —
LISA STRICKLAND Board President —
GEORGE WILLIS VICE PRESIDE —
RANDE DORN Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRY WILSON ARTISITC/EXE 8.3% of Rev
BETH CALARCO Secretary —
TONY CALIGAGAN Board Member —
RANDE DORN Board Member —
CHARLES JOHNSON Board Member —
MARGARET MARSHALL Board President —
KATE PIERCE-MORGAN Treasurer —
DIEGO PINON Board Member —
ERICA TARASOFF Treasurer —
ANDREW WALTZ OPERATIONS D —
GEORGE WILLIS VICE PRESIDE —
LONI PALLADINO Secretary —
DIEGO PINON Board Member —
LISA STRICKLAMD Board President —
GEORGE WILLIS VICE PRESIDE —
RANDE DORN Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jean Isaacs Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
Terry Wilson Artistic Director 0.8% of Rev
Margaret Marshall Board President —
George Willis Board President —
Kata Pierce-Morgan Treasurer —
Beth Calarco Secretary —
Maurine Beinbrink Board Member —
Charles Johnson Board Member —
Rande' Dorn Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jean Isaacs Artistic Director 5.8% of Rev
Terry Wilson Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Laurie Madigan Board President —
Patti Coburn Board President —
Kata Pierce-Morgan Treasurer —
Kathy Herring Hayashi Secretary —
Jessica Curiel Board Member —
Heather D Rider Board Member —
Maurine Beinbrink Board Member —
Beth Calarco Board Member —
Margaret Marshall Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (15 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.