Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 28.2% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 20.1% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 39.0% 36 Fragile Recovery
2020 41.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 26.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 32.7% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 54.9% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 58.3% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 62.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 55.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 42.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 36.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 39.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer
DANIEL CHANG Board Member
JUNE FENG Board Member
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member
LILY H LI Board Member
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member
HELENE ROSES Board Member
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer
DANIEL CHANG Board Member
JUNE FENG Board Member
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member
LILY H LI Board Member
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member
HELENE ROSES Board Member
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer
DANIEL CHANG Board Member
JUNE FENG Board Member
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member
LILY H LI Board Member
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member
HELENE ROSES Board Member
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 46 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.