Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 11.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 10.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 11.2% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 1.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 10.6% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 9.6% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 8.4% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 10.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 10.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 9.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 10.2% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY DAY CO-ED (UNTIL 4/2024) 5.5% of Rev
KRISTI KEEFE Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
JENNIFER PINCK Board President
MOLLY MCDONALD Board President
AMANDA ACCARDI Secretary
RANDALL WALTHER Treasurer
SEAN CURRAN Board Member
RASHIN FAHANDEJ Board Member
KAREN KELLEY GILL Board Member
HANNAH KANSTROOM Board Member
PAUL MILLER Board Member
JEFFREY SAVIANO Board Member
BIANCA SIGH WARD Board Member
JONATHAN SMITH Board Member
STACY SWEENEY Board Member
LOUIS TUCCIARONE Board Member
MARIA MELONE Board Member
CIGDEM OKTEM Board Member
JUANITA FORSYTHE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY DAY Board Member 5.7% of Rev
KRISTI KEEFE Board Member 5.7% of Rev
STACY SWEENEY Board Member
LOUIS TUCCIARONE Board Member
JUANITA FORSYTHE Board Member
BIANCA SIGH WARD Board Member
PAUL MILLER Board Member
JENNIFER PINCK Board President
MOLLY MCDONALD Board President
ANNA BURSAUX Board President
HANNAH B KANSTROOM Secretary
RANDALL M WALTHER Treasurer
JOHN RUGGIERI-LAM Board President
RASHIN FAHANDEJ Board Member
KAREN KELLEY GILL Board Member
AMANDA ACCARDI Board Member
LYNNE KORTENHAUS Board Member
CIGDEM OKTEM Board Member
JONATHAN SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY DAY Board Member 4.6% of Rev
KRISTI KEEFE Board Member 4.6% of Rev
JOHN GFRUGGIERI Board President
MOLLY MCDONALD Board President
JENNIFER PINCK Board President
ANNA BURSAUX Secretary
RANDALL M WALTHER Treasurer
RASHIN FAHANDEJ Board Member
KAREN KELLEY GILL Board Member
JESSICA HUGHES Board Member
HANNAH B KANSTROOM Board Member
LYNNE KORTENHAUS Board Member
CIGDEM OKTEM Board Member
JONATHAN SMITH Board Member
STACY SWEENEY Board Member
LOUIS TUCCIARONE Board Member
LECOLION WASHINGTON Board Member
BIANCA SIGH WARD Board Member
MICHAEL WINSTON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY DAY Board Member 4.8% of Rev
GREGORY RUFFER Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
KRISTI KEEFE Board Member 4.6% of Rev
JOHN G F RUGGIERI Board President
MOLLY MCDONALD Board President
JENNIFER PINCK Board President
RANDALL M WALTHER Treasurer
ANNA BURSAUX Secretary
CIGDEM OKTEM Board Member
HANNAH B KANSTROOM Board Member
JESSICA HUGHES Board Member
KAREN KELLEY-GILL Board Member
RASHIN FAHANDEJ Board Member
LOUIS TUCCIARONE Board Member
JONATHAN SMITH Board Member
LECOLION WASHINGTON Board Member
STACY SWEENEY Board Member
BIANCA SIGH WARD Board Member
LYNNE KORTENHAUS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.