Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 4.4% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 5.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 29.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 — — 29.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 — — 27.7% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 — — 6.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 6.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 7.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.4% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
BOB GRIFFIN Board President —
SCOTT BROWN Board President —
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer —
SUSAN BARROW Secretary —
LESLIE BLAIR Board President —
MIKE GEURIN Board Member —
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member —
ASHLEY MILLER Board Member —
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member —
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member —
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member —
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member —
MARK RANDAK Board Member —
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member —
LIZ FULTON Board Member —
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member —
TRACY MOUSER Board Member —
TYLER MENZALES Board Member —
MARGIT THORNDAL Board Member —
CANDY HOLZER Board Member —
DEVIN WERTMAN Board Member —
SEPHER ESKANDARI Board Member —
TOM HOHN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
ASHLEY MILLER Board Member —
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member —
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member —
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member —
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member —
ROBERT SAUNDERS Board Member —
MARK RANDAK Board Member —
ABIGAIL RENO Board Member —
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member —
LIZ FULTON Board Member —
ZACHARY MATHES Board Member —
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member —
TRACY MOUSER Board Member —
BOB WILMOUTH Board Member —
BOB GRIFFIN Board President —
SCOTT BROWN Board President —
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer —
SUSAN BARROW Secretary —
LESLIE BLAIR Board President —
PENNY DOAK Board Member —
MIKE GEURIN Board Member —
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member —
ANN KOSEMPA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
BOB GRIFFIN Board President —
ROBERT QUAM Board President —
SCOTT BROWN Treasurer —
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer —
SUSAN BARROW Secretary —
LESLIE BLAIR Board President —
PENNY DOAK Board Member —
MIKE GEURIN Board Member —
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member —
ANN KOSEMPA Board Member —
ROBYN MILLER Board Member —
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member —
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member —
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member —
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member —
ROBERT SAUNDERS Board Member —
MARK RANDAK Board Member —
ABIGAIL RENO Board Member —
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member —
LIZ FULTON Board Member —
ZACHARY MATHES Board Member —
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member —
TRACY MOUSER Board Member —
BOB WILMOUTH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 36 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 21 points above the peer median (60 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.