Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.2% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.9% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 4.3% 54 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 5.8% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 6.7% 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 1.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 3.1% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 0.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEOFFREY KERSHNER Executive Director 5.0% of Rev
ELIZABETH STROUD Board President
DERRICK BROWN Board Member
JESSICA CLARKSON Board Member
ANTONIO DAVIS Board Member
DONNA GADDY-BOWEN Board Member
JOSEPH TUCKER Board President
RON SHOULTZ Board Member
MARIA HAYDEN Board Member
ULA KAUPPI Secretary
AMY KOWALSKI Board Member
JAMES WATKINS Board Member
RICHARD LOVING Board Member
PAUL MCWANE Board Member
DR CHALMERS NUNN Board Member
WALKER SIGLER Treasurer
BETH DOYLE Board Member
D TODD IRBY Board Member
ALISON MORRISON SHETLAR Board Member
GEORGEANN SNEAD Board Member
KEVIN HOOPER Board Member
ETHEL REEVES Board Member
MIKE SHANDLER Board Member
DR LAURA GATELY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEOFFREY KERSHNER Executive Director 5.0% of Rev
ELIZABETH STROUD Board President
MARY DALTON Board Member
DR JAMES M PEERY III Board Member
JEANELL SMITH Board Member
DERRICK BROWN Board Member
GEORGE DAWSON Board Member
ANTONIO DAVIS Board Member
JOHN W FRANCISCO ESQ Board Member
JOSEPH TUCKER Board Member
RON SHOULTZ Board Member
ROGER KEELING Board Member
RICK GROOMS Board Member
ULA KAUPPI Secretary
AMY KOWALSKI Board Member
JAMES WATKINS Board Member
RICHARD LOVING Board President
PAUL MCWANE Board Member
DR CHALMERS NUNN Board Member
WALKER SIGLER Board Member
JESSICA CLARKSON Board Member
D TODD IRBY Board Member
DONNA GADDY-BOWEN Board Member
GEORGEANN SNEAD Treasurer
KEVIN HOOPER Board Member
ETHEL REEVES Board Member
MIKE SHANDLER Board Member
DR LAURA GATELY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEOFFREY KERSHNER Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
ELIZABETH STROUD Board President
MARY DALTON Board Member
DR JAMES M PEERY III Board Member
JEANELL SMITH Board Member
DERRICK BROWN Board Member
GEORGE DAWSON Board Member
ANTONIO DAVIS Board Member
JOHN W FRANCISCO ESQ Board Member
JOSEPH TUCKER Board Member
RON SHOULTZ Board Member
ROGER KEELING Board Member
DR WILLIAM R KERSHNER Board Member
ULA KAUPPI Board Member
AMY KOWALSKI Board Member
PERRY PAYNE MILLNER Board Member
RICHARD LOVING Board President
PAUL MCWANE Board Member
DR CHALMERS NUNN Board Member
ANITRA B WEBSTER Secretary
JESSICA CLARKSON Board Member
D TODD IRBY Board Member
DONNA GADDY-BOWEN Board Member
GEORGEANN SNEAD Treasurer
KEVIN HOOPER Board Member
ETHEL REEVES Board Member
MIKE SHANDLER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 48 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.