Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 28.8% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 28.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 24.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 25.8% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 27.1% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2016 — — 25.0% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 32.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 — — 25.5% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 23.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 27.6% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
JESSICA BEJARANO Board Member —
NORA BRADY Board Member —
CHELSEA CHAMBERS Board Member —
AMANDA WU CHROUST Board Member —
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member —
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer —
ALICIA GONZALEZ Board Member —
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Secretary —
JAMEI HASWELL Board Member —
MIEKO HATANO Board Member —
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member —
DEAN MCVAY Board Member —
AKILAH MORGAN Board Member —
NICOLA REILLY Board Member —
JONATHAN RIOS Board Member —
ALICE SAURO Board President —
ELIZABETH SHRIBMAN Board Member —
SCOTT VANDRICK Vice President —
AMBER JOY WEBER Board Member —
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member —
JOHN WINEGLASS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 18.7% of Rev
AUBREY BERGAUER Board Member —
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member —
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer —
SCOTT VANDRICK Board President —
JOHN WINEGLASS Board President —
NORA BRADY Board Member —
MIREYA JONES Board Member —
ALICIA GONZALEZ Board Member —
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member —
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Secretary —
DEAN MCVAY Board President —
JAMEI HASWELL Board President —
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member —
NICOLA REILLY Board Member —
ELIZABETH SHRIBMAN Board Member —
SEAN SUTTON Board President —
ALICE SAURO Board President —
AMBER WEBER Board Member —
STEPHEN WILSON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 17.1% of Rev
AUBREY BERGAUER Board President —
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member —
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer —
SCOTT VANDRICK Board Member —
JOHN WINEGLASS Board Member —
LACEY HUSZCZA Secretary —
MIREYA JONES Board Member —
DOROTHY WISE Board Member —
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member —
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Board Member —
DEAN MCVAY Board President —
JAMEI HASWELL Board Member —
AMY WILLIAMS Board President —
JULIA WARD Board President —
ANTHONY PARNTHER Board Member —
SEAN SUTTON Board President —
ALICE SAURO Board Member —
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member —
STEPHEN WILSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.