Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 28.8% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 28.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 24.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 25.8% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 27.1% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2016 25.0% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 32.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 25.5% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 23.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 27.6% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
JESSICA BEJARANO Board Member
NORA BRADY Board Member
CHELSEA CHAMBERS Board Member
AMANDA WU CHROUST Board Member
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer
ALICIA GONZALEZ Board Member
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Secretary
JAMEI HASWELL Board Member
MIEKO HATANO Board Member
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member
DEAN MCVAY Board Member
AKILAH MORGAN Board Member
NICOLA REILLY Board Member
JONATHAN RIOS Board Member
ALICE SAURO Board President
ELIZABETH SHRIBMAN Board Member
SCOTT VANDRICK Vice President
AMBER JOY WEBER Board Member
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member
JOHN WINEGLASS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 18.7% of Rev
AUBREY BERGAUER Board Member
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer
SCOTT VANDRICK Board President
JOHN WINEGLASS Board President
NORA BRADY Board Member
MIREYA JONES Board Member
ALICIA GONZALEZ Board Member
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Secretary
DEAN MCVAY Board President
JAMEI HASWELL Board President
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member
NICOLA REILLY Board Member
ELIZABETH SHRIBMAN Board Member
SEAN SUTTON Board President
ALICE SAURO Board President
AMBER WEBER Board Member
STEPHEN WILSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH WEBER Executive Director 17.1% of Rev
AUBREY BERGAUER Board President
JERI CRAWFORD Board Member
STEVE FRIEDLANDER Treasurer
SCOTT VANDRICK Board Member
JOHN WINEGLASS Board Member
LACEY HUSZCZA Secretary
MIREYA JONES Board Member
DOROTHY WISE Board Member
KATHRYN MARTIN Board Member
LORIBETH GREGORY-BECK Board Member
DEAN MCVAY Board President
JAMEI HASWELL Board Member
AMY WILLIAMS Board President
JULIA WARD Board President
ANTHONY PARNTHER Board Member
SEAN SUTTON Board President
ALICE SAURO Board Member
DONNA WILLIAMS Board Member
STEPHEN WILSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.