Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.2% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 23.1% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 16.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 36.1% 38 Fragile Recovery
2019 36.6% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 43.7% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 47.4% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2016 48.6% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 45.9% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 28.0% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 27.4% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 23.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 58.8% 38 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Annie Larkin Board Member 25.2% of Rev
Britt Hanson Board President
Christine Rhodes Secretary
Joelle Landers Treasurer
Ann English Board President
Gretchen Bonaduce Board Member
Kathleen Heard Board Member
Joseph Saba Board Member
Mike Anderson Board Member
Scott Beardshear Board Member
Etta Kralovec Board Member
Cathe Wright Board Member
Fernando Alday Board Member
John Acosta Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Gustavson Board Member 17.3% of Rev
David Smith Board President
Christine Rhodes Secretary
Joan Hansen Treasurer
Ann English Board President
Gretchen Bonaduce Board Member
Heather Lundstrum Board Member
Kimberly Baltunis Board Member
Father Joseph Saba Board Member
George Cullinan Board Member
Robert Quintanar Board Member
Scott Beardshear Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Gustavson Board Member 15.7% of Rev
David Smith Board President
Christine Rhodes Secretary
Joan Hansen Treasurer
Ann English Board President
Bob Gaethje Board Member
Heather Lindstrom Board Member
Kimberly Baltunis Board Member
Father Joseph Saba Board Member
George Cullinan Board Member
Robert Quintanar Board Member
Scott Beardshear Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Gustavson Board Member 17.3% of Rev
David Smith Board President
Christine Rhodes Secretary
Joan Hansen Treasurer
Ann English Board President
Bob Gaethje Board Member
Heather Lindstrom Board Member
Suzanne Page Board Member
Cathe Wright Board Member
George Cullinan Board Member
Laurie McKenna Board Member
Bob Howell Board Member
Robert Quintanar Board Member
Scott Beardshear Board Member
Sharon Frosco Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (50 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.