Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 64 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSS SHANER | Board President | — | ||
| TED MCWHARF | Board Member | — | ||
| GREGORY SPRING | Board Member | — | ||
| BRETT MILLER | Board Member | — | ||
| GARY BRUMBAUGH | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD NEIDICH | Board Member | — | ||
| CHRIS HAAG | Board Member | — | ||
| ROBERT BOWER | Board President | — | ||
| CHRISTINE VAN STEAN | Board President | — | ||
| ROBERT HUNTER | Treasurer | — | ||
| KEN WILSON | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTINE VAN STEAN | Board President | — | ||
| ROBERT BOWER | Board President | — | ||
| KEN WILSON | Secretary | — | ||
| ROBERT HUNTER | Treasurer | — | ||
| PAUL LAW | Board President | — | ||
| DAVID HIGGS | Board Member | — | ||
| ANDREW MAGIN | Board Member | — | ||
| TED MCWHARF | Board Member | — | ||
| RUSS SHANER | Board Member | — | ||
| GREGORY SPRING | Board Member | — | ||
| KEN VENERON | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 64 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 25 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.