Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 4.9% 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 4.1% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 3.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 2.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 2.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 5.5% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 6.1% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 5.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
CHWEE DOREEN LEE HR MANAGER 1.4% of Rev
JANIS ZINN Board President
SOHI SOHN Board President
SHARMILA ACHARYA Secretary
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer
MIKE COUCH Board Member
JUDY CRATES Board Member
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member
LLOYD HOLMS Board Member
BRUCE HUMPHREY Board Member
SUYUN KIM Board Member
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member
LYNN MILLER Board Member
ROBERT REAY Board Member
CAROLYN STUART Board Member
SUCHITRA SUBRAHMANYAN Board Member
JINLIN WANG Board Member
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member
LEE TAVROW Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.0% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
JANIS ZINN Board President
SOHI SOHN Board President
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer
SHARMILA ACHARYA Secretary
CAROLYN STUART Board Member
MIKE COUCH Board Member
JUDY CRATES Board Member
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member
SUYUN KIM Board Member
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member
ROBERT REAY Board Member
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member
LLOYD HOLMS Board Member
BRUCE HUMPHREY Board Member
LYNN MILLER Board Member
SUCHITRA SUBRAHMANYAN Board Member
JINLIN WANG Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
CAROL SANDERS Treasurer 1.2% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
CAROLYN STUART Board President
JANIS ZINN Board President
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer
SOHI SOHN Secretary
SHARMILA ACHARYA Board Member
MIKE COUCH Board Member
JUDY CRATES Board Member
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member
SUYUN KIM Board Member
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member
ANNE MARIE MCCAULY Board Member
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member
ROBERT REAY Board Member
KATHY THIBODEAUX Board Member
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 53 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.