Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 4.9% 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 4.1% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 3.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 2.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 2.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.5% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 6.1% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 5.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
CHWEE DOREEN LEE HR MANAGER 1.4% of Rev
JANIS ZINN Board President —
SOHI SOHN Board President —
SHARMILA ACHARYA Secretary —
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer —
MIKE COUCH Board Member —
JUDY CRATES Board Member —
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member —
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member —
LLOYD HOLMS Board Member —
BRUCE HUMPHREY Board Member —
SUYUN KIM Board Member —
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member —
LYNN MILLER Board Member —
ROBERT REAY Board Member —
CAROLYN STUART Board Member —
SUCHITRA SUBRAHMANYAN Board Member —
JINLIN WANG Board Member —
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member —
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member —
LEE TAVROW Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.0% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
JANIS ZINN Board President —
SOHI SOHN Board President —
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer —
SHARMILA ACHARYA Secretary —
CAROLYN STUART Board Member —
MIKE COUCH Board Member —
JUDY CRATES Board Member —
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member —
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member —
SUYUN KIM Board Member —
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member —
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member —
ROBERT REAY Board Member —
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member —
LLOYD HOLMS Board Member —
BRUCE HUMPHREY Board Member —
LYNN MILLER Board Member —
SUCHITRA SUBRAHMANYAN Board Member —
JINLIN WANG Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE SCOTT GROVE Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
CAROL SANDERS Treasurer 1.2% of Rev
LAUREN FLETCHER Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
CAROLYN STUART Board President —
JANIS ZINN Board President —
JAMES SANDSTROM Treasurer —
SOHI SOHN Secretary —
SHARMILA ACHARYA Board Member —
MIKE COUCH Board Member —
JUDY CRATES Board Member —
JOHN D'AMBROSIO Board Member —
JULIETTE FARACO Board Member —
SUYUN KIM Board Member —
PETER LANDSBERGER Board Member —
ANNE MARIE MCCAULY Board Member —
JOHN J MILLER JR Board Member —
ROBERT REAY Board Member —
KATHY THIBODEAUX Board Member —
SEAN WILKINSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 53 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.