Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 10.8% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 6.3% 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.8% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.8% 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 4.1% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 4.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 8.6% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.2% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 7.3% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 8.4% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.9% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 7.8% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TAMI FAUVER Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
ZACHARY VAUGHN Board President —
GRACE KELMER Board President —
PAULETTE JOHNSON Secretary —
PAUL FLETCHER Treasurer —
BUDD HAEMER Board Member —
ALAN CORKHILL Board Member —
MATT KAISER Board Member —
ANNA BROOKS Board Member —
PRINCELLA TOBIAS Board Member —
ALISON BULLOCK Board Member —
NICOLE BROWN Board Member —
JUAN GANUM Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TAMI FAUVER Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
BRIAN EDLEFSON Board President —
GRACE KELMER Board President —
PAUL FLETCHER Secretary —
STEVE WESSELL Treasurer —
BUDD HAEMER Board Member —
ALAN CORKHILL Board Member —
KATIE KWON Board Member —
ANNA BROOKS Board Member —
ZACHARY VAUGHN Board Member —
ALISON BULLOCK Board Member —
NICOLE BROWN Board Member —
PAULETTE JOHNSON Board Member —
PRINCELLA TOBIAS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA GOURLEY Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
LAURA LUKAS Board President —
BRIAN EDLEFSON Board President —
GRACE KELMER Secretary —
PAUL FLETCHER Treasurer —
BUDD HAEMER Board Member —
JUAN GANUM Board Member —
KATIE KWON Board Member —
ANNA BROOKS Board Member —
ZACHARY VAUGHN Board Member —
STEVE WESSELL Board Member —
NICOLE BROWN Board Member —
PAULETTE JOHNSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA GOURLEY Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
LAURA LUKAS Board President —
BRIAN EDLEFSON Board President —
GRACE KELMER Secretary —
BUDD HAEMER Treasurer —
HEATHER MARSCHKE Treasurer —
PAUL FLETCHER Board Member —
JUAN GANUM Board Member —
DESIE HARDIN Board Member —
KATIE KWON Board Member —
SUSAN MILLER Board Member —
JEFF SAYLOR Board Member —
STEVE WESSELL Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA GOURLEY Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
LAURA LUKAS Board President —
BRIAN EDLEFSON Board President —
GRACE KELMER Secretary —
BUDD HAEMER Treasurer —
HEATHER MARSCHKE Treasurer —
JUAN GANUM Board Member —
PAUL FLETCHER Board Member —
DESIE HARDIN Board Member —
SUSAN MILLER Board Member —
KATIE KWON Board Member —
JEFF SAYLOR Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 95 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (40 vs. 76).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.