Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 9.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 9.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 11.7% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 13.3% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 13.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 14.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 11.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 13.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 13.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 10.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 11.3% 42 Fragile Recovery
2011 13.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA JENSEN Executive Director 9.6% of Rev
CATHY EARLY Board President
JENNIFER WEDDERMANN Board Member
LAURA DAVIS Board President
DEBBIE JAAP Board Member
BENJAMIN KAMITHI Treasurer
LI-LING LIAO Board Member
MELODY CAMP Secretary
AMY BOERS Board Member
RACHEL BROWN Board President
JULIE GONSALVES Board Member
ELENI WILLIS Board Member
JOSEPH SCOTT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA JENSEN Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
ANNA JENSEN EXECUTIVE DI 6.1% of Rev
SUE DALTON Board President
CATHY EARLY 1ST VICE PRE
LYNNE EVERLING 2ND VICE PRE
JENNIFER WEDDERMANN Treasurer
LAURA DAVIS Secretary
MAGGIE DUGGAN Board Member
BRIAN GILFEATHER Board Member
JOHN GREGORY Board Member
DEBBIE JAAP Board Member
BENJAMIN KAMITHI Board Member
LI-LING LIAO Board Member
JENNIFER RHYNE Board Member
FRED WARNICK Board Member
ANNA WITTSTRUCK Board Member
SUE DALTON Board President
CATHY EARLY Board President
LYNNE EVERLING Board President
JENNIFER WEDDERMANN Treasurer
LAURA DAVIS Secretary
MAGGIE DUGGAN Board Member
BRIAN GILFEATHER Board Member
JOHN GREGORY Board Member
DEBBIE JAAP Board Member
BENJAMIN KAMITHI Board Member
LI-LING LIAO Board Member
JENNIFER RHYNE Board Member
FRED WARNICK Board Member
ANNA WITTSTRUCK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOMA COBBS EXECUTIVE DI 7.3% of Rev
BILL SIBBERS Board President
SUE DALTON 1ST VICE PRE
LYNNE EVERLING 2ND VICE PRE
JENNIFER WEDDERMANN Secretary
CATHY EARLY Treasurer
LAURA DAVIS Board Member
MAGGIE DUGGAN Board Member
JOHN GREGORY Board Member
DEBBIE JAAP Board Member
ALYSSA MORLEY Board Member
FRED WARNICK Board Member
ANNA WITTSTRUCK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOMA COBBS EXECUTIVE DI 7.3% of Rev
BILL SIBBERS Board President
SUE DALTON 1ST VICE PRE
LYNNE EVERLING 2ND VICE PRE
JENNIFER WEDDERMANN ACTING SECRE
LAWRENCE BRADLEY Treasurer
LAURA DAVIS Board Member
ROBERT HUTCHINSON Board Member
CATHY EARLY Board Member
ANNA WITTSTRUCK Board Member
ALYSSA MORLEY Board Member
JOHN GREGORY Board Member
FRED WARNICK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.