Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLISON TERZYK Board President
MADELEINE CUMMINGS VICE PREDIDENT
SARAH McCAGUE Treasurer
KRISTIN KALBACH Board Member
GWEN NOONE Secretary
RUDY SPRINKLE Board Member
DEBORAH DISSERENS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAQUEL GARCIA Artistic Director 16.0% of Rev
JUDY LARGE ACCOMPANIST 6.0% of Rev
ALLISON TERZYK Board President
SARAH MCCAGUE Treasurer
MADELEINE CUMMINGS Board President
DEBORAH DISERENS Secretary
SOFIA SAAVEDRA Board Member
RUDY SPRINKLE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (75 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.