Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 1.6% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 4.6% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 2.9% 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 7.4% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 1.0% 56 Fragile Recovery
2017 28.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 1.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 0.9% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 1.1% 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 0.7% 59 Fragile Recovery
2012 1.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 0.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 1.6% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 1.9% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 11 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 39 points above the peer median (60 vs. 21).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.