Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
47
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 5.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 6.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.3% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.8% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.9% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 3.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 3.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 2.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 6.5% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER CARLSON Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board President —
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board President —
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board President —
PAULINE MONSON Secretary —
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer —
RONALD ARENA Board Member —
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member —
JACQUELINE R D'ERCOLE Board Member —
JANICE HARTMANN Board Member —
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member —
KENNETH B MUMMA Board Member —
MEGAN SUTHERLAND Board Member —
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board Member —
STEPHEN H KALIS Board Member —
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board Member —
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANICE HARTMANN Board Member 2.0% of Rev
JENNIFER CARLSON Executive Director 1.9% of Rev
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board President —
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President —
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary —
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer —
RONALD ARENA Board Member —
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member —
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member —
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member —
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member —
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member —
PAULINE MONSON Board Member —
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board Member —
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member —
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN METZNER Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board President —
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President —
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary —
JANICE HARTMANN Treasurer —
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board President —
RONALD ARENA Board Member —
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member —
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member —
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer —
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member —
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member —
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member —
PAULINE MONSON Board Member —
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member —
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN METZNER Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board President —
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President —
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary —
JANICE HARTMANN Treasurer —
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board Member —
RONALD ARENA Board Member —
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member —
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member —
MATTHEW CARBERRY Board Member —
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member —
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member —
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member —
PAULINE MONSON Board Member —
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member —
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.