Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 59 Fragile Recovery
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Cochrane Board President
Justin Cochrane Board President
Cheryl Chewkanes Secretary
Maria Leonetti Treasurer
Alison King Board Member
Mary Beth Betzler Board Member
Chris Betzler Board Member
Isadora Lyons Board Member
Andrew McDermott Board Member
Sean Holleran Board Member
Lacie Fischley Board Member
Jensen Davis Board Member
Richard Steinhardt Board Member
Liz Bradley Board Member
Mary Smith Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (65 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.