Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 14.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 16.6% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 22.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 27.5% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 28.5% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 0.5% 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 7.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 6.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 10.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN KHAN Board President 13.5% of Rev
JACK ARMSTRONG Treasurer
ALAN RAZAK Board President
TAYLOR WILLIAMS Board Member
SHERYL FORSTE-GRUPP Board Member
ALISON LERMAN Board Member
GREG RICCIARDI Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN KHAN Board President 29.3% of Rev
JACK ARMSTRONG Treasurer
ALAN RAZAK Board President
TAYLOR WILLIAMS Board Member
SHERYL FORSTE-GRUPP Board Member
ALISON AVERY Board Member
NICOLE KINDBEITER Board Member
GREG RICCIARDI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points below the peer median (25 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 21 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.