Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 26.6% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 13.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 49.7% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 23.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 10.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 10.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 9.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.1% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 7.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 7.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 6.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ZACHARY CHIERO Board Member 12.5% of Rev
JENNIFER SMITH Artistic Director 6.6% of Rev
LANDIS SMITH EX-OFFICIO 5.5% of Rev
LESLIE REIDEL RESIDENT DIR 2.0% of Rev
BEVERLY FERGUSON Board Member —
TANESHA FORD Secretary —
MARGARET HEER Treasurer —
MICHAEL KOLODNER Board President —
CELESTE MONTGOMERY Board Member —
RYAN PACZKOWSKI Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ZACHARY CHIERO Board Member 9.8% of Rev
JENNIFER SMITH Artistic Director 7.5% of Rev
LANDIS SMITH EX-OFFICIO 6.6% of Rev
LESLIE REIDEL EX-OFFICIO 2.8% of Rev
BEVERLY FERGUSON Board Member —
CELESTE MONTGOMERY Board Member —
RYAN PACZKOWSKI Board Member —
TANESHA FORD Secretary —
MARGARET HEER Treasurer —
MICHAEL KOLODNER Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER BLATCHLEY SMITH Artistic Director 6.0% of Rev
LANDIS SMITH Artistic Director 6.0% of Rev
LESLIE REIDEL Board Member 4.1% of Rev
RYAN PACZKOWSKI Board Member —
BRETT TEWKSBURY Board Member —
ELENA KOUDINOV Treasurer —
MICHAEL KOLODNER Board President —
DR JOHN AMOROSO Board Member —
TANESHA FORD Board Member —
YVAN KOUDINOV Board Member —
KEITH MCANINCH Board Member —
CELESTE MONTGOMERY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER BLATCHLEY SMITH Artistic Director 4.8% of Rev
LANDIS SMITH Artistic Director 4.4% of Rev
LESLIE REIDEL Artistic Director 3.1% of Rev
DR JOHN AMOROSO Board Member —
CELESTE MONTGOMERY Board Member —
KEITH MCANINCH Board Member —
BRETT TEWKSBURY Board Member —
FAITH WOHL Board Member —
MICHAEL KOLODNER Board President —
ELENA SMIRNOVA Treasurer —
YVAN KOUDINOV Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LANDIS SMITH Artistic Director 6.5% of Rev
JENNIFER SMITH Artistic Director 3.8% of Rev
LESLIE REIDEL Artistic Director 1.8% of Rev
DR JOHN AMOROSO Board Member —
JOHN BULLOCK Board Member —
ALISSA DHAWAN Board Member —
CELESTE MONTGOMERY Board Member —
KEITH MCANINCH Board Member —
YVAN KOUDINOV Board Member —
FAITH WOHL Board Member —
MICHAEL KOLODNER Board President —
ELENA SMIRNOVA Treasurer —
WILLIAM ELLERBE Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.