Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 37.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER HAAS Board President —
JEFFREY CARSON Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN Board Member —
DAN SLOANE Board Member —
STEVE DEXTER Board Member —
CALEB TRACEY Board Member —
MATTHEW PALMER Board Member —
LUIS MARRERO Board Member —
STEVE QUINN Board Member —
PETER HAAS Board President —
VAUGHN BRWON Board Member —
JEFFREY CARSON Board Member —
DAVID BRONSTEIN Board Member —
STEVE DEXTER Board Member —
BERT DIZON Board Member —
DOUG WALTER Board Member —
JOHN HAIR Board Member —
LUIS MARRERO Board Member —
OWEN SACCO Board Member —
ROBERT D'ERRICO Board Member —
DOMINIC SPADACCINI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ONTE MCCLENDON Board President —
STEVE DEXTER VICE PRESIDE —
DEREK JONES Treasurer —
CALEB TRACY Board Member —
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member —
JOSEPH BUCHES Board Member —
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BIELENBERG Board Member 24.5% of Rev
JOSEPH J BUCHES Board Member 22.1% of Rev
DEREK JONES Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER PINTO Board Member —
ALEXANDER RIOH Board Member —
MATTHEW SIMMERS Board Member —
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member —
ONTE MCCLENDON Board President —
CHRISTOPHER PINTO VICE PRESIDE —
SHYAM OZA Treasurer —
ALEXANDER RIOH Secretary —
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member —
DUSTIN CATES Board Member —
BRIAN CHAFFINCH Board Member —
JOSHUA JOHNSON Board Member —
DEREK JONES Board Member —
LELAND KIMBAL Board Member —
MARK SCHRADER Board Member —
JOHN-PAUL VERMITSKY Board Member —
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member —
ANASTASIA ZUCCARO Board President —
ONTE MCCLENDON VICE PRESIDE —
JOHN-PAUL VERMITSKY Treasurer —
ERIC GUTSHALL Secretary —
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member —
DUSTIN CATES Board Member —
BRIAN CHAFFINCH Board Member —
CHRIS COLEMAN Board Member —
JOE EHRMAN-DUPRE Board Member —
JOSHUA JOHNSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (5 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.