Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 57 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Slechta Board President
Vacant Board President
Judith Koch Secretary
Scott Rhoads Treasurer
Julie Beth Drey Board Member
Willis Rapp Board Member
John Ernesto Board Member
Jessica Manning Board Member
Patricia Kline Board Member
Laura Shipe Board Member
Jessica Godek Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points above the peer median (90 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 57 → 57 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.