Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
27
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 31.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 36 Fragile Recovery
2022 27.4% 39 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 28.4% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 13.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Hogue Board Member 17.1% of Rev
Donald R Meineke Artistic Director 14.0% of Rev
Michael Meloy Board President
Margaret Dowling Treasurer
Theodore G Cheek Secretary
Eli Anders Board Member
Julianne Baird Board Member
Judd Serotta Board Member
Maggie Barnette Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Hogue Board Member 17.1% of Rev
MATTHEW GLANDORF Artistic Director 14.0% of Rev
Matthew Glandorf Artistic Director 9.4% of Rev
MICHAEL HOGUE Board Member 8.6% of Rev
Michael Meloy Board President
Margaret Dowling Treasurer
Theodore G Cheek Secretary
Eli Anders Board Member
Kenneth Levy Board Member
Judd Serotta Board Member
MICHAEL MELOY ESQ Board President
GWYNNE GRASBERGER Board President
MARGARET DOWLING Treasurer
THEODORE CHEEK Secretary
JUDD SEROTTA ESQ Board Member
ELI ANDERS PHD Board Member
KEN LEVY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW GLANDORF Artistic Director 7.3% of Rev
DENISE KAPLAN Board Member 5.5% of Rev
GWYNNE GRASBERGER Board President
STEVEN RALSTON Treasurer
MARGARET DOWLING Treasurer
THEODORE CHEEK Secretary
MICHAEL MELOY Board Member
LESLIE SULLIVAN Board Member
JUDD SEROTTA Board Member
ELI ANDERS Board Member
KEN LEVY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points below the peer median (25 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~18 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.