Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 64 Stable Decline Risk
2023 65 Stable Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden 68 Stable Stable Watch
2021 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 64 Stable Stable Watch
2019 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 59 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATT HERTLEIN Board President
WENDY CLINE Treasurer
AUTUMN BURKE-DEMPSEY VICE PRESIDE
DANIELLE RISHELL Secretary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS-SEE ATTACHED DIRECTORS

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEANNE KASSAB Board President
MASON STROUSE Treasurer
GREG NORRIS Secretary
MATT HERTLEIN VICE-PRESIDE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS-SEE ATTACHED DIRECTORS

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEW DUTTRY Board President
MASON STROUSE Treasurer
GREG NORRIS Secretary
LEANNE KASSAB VICE-PRESIDE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS-SEE ATTACHED DIRECTORS
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points above the peer median (90 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.