Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 20.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 23.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.7% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 14.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 25.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 22.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 21.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 27.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 24.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 14.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 13.1% of Rev
Thomas Lloyd Ex Officio 13.1% of Rev
SUSAN JOHNSON Asst. Conductor 4.0% of Rev
Susan Johnson Ex Officio 4.0% of Rev
MICHELLE MUELLER Ex Officio 3.1% of Rev
Michelle Mueller Ex Officio 3.1% of Rev
AMY SCHMIDT Board President
SUSAN MCDONNELL Board President
JANE KAMP Singer
AMY OLIVER Singer
COLIN JENEI Community
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary
SUSAN SCOTT Singer
SKYE COOPER RAINEY Singer
RACHEL SANDERS Board President
MARY MUTH Board President
Rachel Sanders Board President
Susannah Roberts Board President
Kay Rozolis Treasurer
Chaunce Monta Secretary
Susan Bindig Singer
Amy Hammerschmidt Oliver Singer
Jane Kamp Singer
Claire Ma Singer
Susan McDonnell Singer
Mary Muth Singer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 13.4% of Rev
AMY PERRY Board Member
SUSAN MCDONNELL Board President
ELIZABETH CLARK Board Member
JEFF FULGHAM Chairman
COLIN JENEL Board Member
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary
MARY MUTH Board President
ALLEN REGAN Board Member
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member
AMY SCHMIDT Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 11.3% of Rev
MICHELLE MUELLER Board Member 2.8% of Rev
JAY BRODISH Treasurer
BOB VERNON Board Member
ELIZABETH CLARK Board Member
JEFF FULGHAM Chairman
COLIN JENEL Board Member
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary
AMY PERRY Board Member
MARY MUTH Board President
ALLEN REGAN Board Member
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 10.5% of Rev
MICHAEL MUELLER Board Member 2.8% of Rev
BONNIE BERKMEIER Board Member
LAURA BIERSMITH Board Member
ELIZABETH CLARK Treasurer
JEFF FULGHAM CHAIRMAN
COLLIN JENEI Board Member
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary
MILO MORRIS Board Member
MARY MUTH Board President
ALLEN REGAN Board Member
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member
BOB VERNON Board Member
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.