Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 12.7% 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 7.9% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 17.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 16.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 16.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 14.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 10.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 14.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 13.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 10.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 12.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERESA STAUB Executive Director 12.5% of Rev
KELLY BARRATT Secretary
PERRY BENEDUCE PRESDIENT ELECT
LUKE BRESLIN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER CURCIA Board Member
PEDER HAGBERG Board Member
MICHELLE KNOX Board Member
RICHARD MURPHY Board Member
MELANIE PENNEY Board Member
LYNN REICH Board Member
VICTORIA REIS Board Member
VICKIE SNOY Treasurer
DAVID STOUT Board President
GINA TORELLO Board Member
MICHELLE WILLIAMS Board President
JACKELINE MEJIAS-FUERTES Board Member
KAREN ZABARSKY Board Member
KRISTINE ZULEWSKI Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERESA STAUB Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
KELLY BARRATT Secretary
PERRY BENEDUCE Board Member
LUKE BRESLIN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER CURCIA Board Member
LESLIE CURRAN Board Member
KATHY DONNELLY PAST CHAIRMAN
MARGOT GOLDBERG Board Member
PEDER HAGBERG Board Member
MICHELLE KNOX Board Member
RICHARD MURPHY Board Member
KRISTEN PADOVANO Board Member
MELANIE PENNEY Board Member
LYNN REICH Board Member
VICTORIA REIS Board Member
VICKIE SNOY Treasurer
DAVID STOUT CHAIRMAN
GINA TORELLO Board Member
MICHELLE WILLIAMS VICE CHAIRMAN
DARRELL WILLIS Board Member
KRISTEN ZABARSKY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERESA STAUB EXECUTIVE DI 8.9% of Rev
KELLY BARRATT Secretary
JOE BARRIS Board President
PERRY BENEDUCE Board Member
MELANIE PENNEY CPA Board Member
CHRISTOPHER M CURCIA Board Member
LESLIE CURRAN Board Member
KATHY DONNELLY Board Member
LUKE BRESLIN ESQ Board Member
MARGOT GOLDBERG Board Member
PEDER HAGBERG Board Member
SARA LACOMBE Board Member
RICHARD MURPHY Board Member
KRISTEN PADOVANO Board Member
LYNN REICH Board Member
VICTORIA REIS Board Member
VICKIE J SNOY Treasurer
DAVID STOUT Board Member
GINA TORELLO Board Member
MICHELLE WILLIAMS Board President
DARRELL WILLIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 49 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 38 points above the peer median (60 vs. 22).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 46 over 5 years (improving by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.