Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 38 Fragile Recovery
2021 4.3% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 5.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR BRIAN MCGUIRE LEAD PERSON/PRINCIPAL 2.0% of Rev
JILL CARSON Secretary 1.5% of Rev
PAMELA YORK Board President
IAN ANGOTTI Board Member
JEFFREY CARAWAY Board Member
JOSEPH M LEHMAN Board Member
KERRY BIRCH Board Member
ALLISON LUFF Board Member
JENNIFER GATEWOOD Board President
PATRICIA NICODEMUS FACULTY REPRESENTATIVE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR BRIAN MCGUIRE LEAD PERSON/PRINCIPAL 1.9% of Rev
JILL CARSON Secretary 1.3% of Rev
PHYLLIS LONDON Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
PAMELA YORK Board President
IAN ANGOTTI Board Member
JEFFREY CARAWAY Board Member
JOSEPH M LEHMAN Board Member
PAMELA WALKER Board Member
KERRY BIRCH Board Member
ALLISON LUFF Board Member
JENNIFER GATEWOOD Board President
PATRICIA NICODEMUS FACULTY REPRESENTATIVE

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR BRIAN MCGUIRE LEAD PERSON/PRINCIPAL 1.6% of Rev
JILL CARSON Secretary 1.2% of Rev
PHYLLIS LONDON Treasurer 0.7% of Rev
PATRICIA NICODEMUS FACULTY REPRESENTATIVE 0.6% of Rev
PAMELA YORK Board President
IAN ANGOTTI Board Member
JEFFREY CARAWAY Board Member
JOSEPH M LEHMAN Board Member
PAMELA WALKER Board Member
KERRY BIRCH Board Member
ALLISON LUFF Board Member
JENNIFER GATEWOOD Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 593 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B3.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 44 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.