Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 51.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 8.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 13.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 13.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 16.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 14.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 12.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 9.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 12.9% 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 12.8% 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher Handley Executive Director —
Jessica Marinelli Board President —
Michelle Bouton Board President —
Axel H Heimer III Secretary —
Nakiea Cook Treasurer —
Karen King Board Member —
Katie Pogorzelski Board Member —
Linda Szal Sutton Board Member —
Lee Ann Vogt Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher Handley Executive Director —
Jessica Marinelli Board President —
Michelle Bouton Board President —
Nakiea Cook Treasurer —
Alyssa Brouillet Board Member —
Alex H Heimer III Board Member —
Karen King Board Member —
David Sambora Board Member —
Linda Szal Sutton Board Member —
Lee Ann Vogt Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIA PENDOLINO Board President —
MICHELLE BOUTON Board President —
NAKIEA COOK Treasurer —
KEAVIN LEARY Board Member —
SHAZAD MOHAMMED Board Member —
ARMAND PETRI Board Member —
DAVID SAMBORA Board Member —
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM PIAZZA Board President —
MARIA PENDOLINO Secretary —
DAVID SAMBORA Treasurer —
MICHELLE BOUTON Board Member —
NAKIEA COOK Board Member —
LEONARD G LONDON Board Member —
SHAZAD MUSTAPHA MOHAMMED Board Member —
ARMAND PETRI Board Member —
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM PIAZZA Board President —
DENNIS KNIPFING Board President —
ELIZABETH BARSI Secretary —
DAVID SAMBORA Treasurer —
MICHELLE BOUTON Board Member —
LEONARD G LONDON Board Member —
SHAZAD MUSTAPHA MOHAMMED Board Member —
MARIA PENDOLINO Board Member —
ARMAND PETRI Board Member —
DAVID SIPOS Board Member —
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (5 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.