Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 3.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 25.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 — — 62.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 12.3% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 22.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 40.3% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 — — 41.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 42.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 67.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 56.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 33.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 30.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 39.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2011 — — 10.1% 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 2.7% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 1.1% of Rev
Michael Quinn Board Member —
Virginia Mills Orchestra Representative —
Alan Lowne Board President —
Carol Lowne Board President —
Beverly Voos Board Member —
Ben Martin Board Member —
Yvonne Adams Board Member —
Laurie Kennedy Board Member —
Steve Landgren Board Member —
Harrison Hartsough Board Member —
David Mear Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Harman Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 1.1% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.5% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member —
David Mear Treasurer —
Michael Quinn Board Member —
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative —
Alan Lowne Board President —
Carol Lowne Board President —
Beverly Voos Board Member —
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member —
Ben Martin Board Member —
Yvonne Adams Board Member —
Sue Brown Board Member —
Virginia Mills Orchestra Representative —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 2.4% of Rev
David Harman Board Member 1.0% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.4% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member —
David Mear Treasurer —
Michael Quinn Board Member —
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative —
Alan Lowne Board President —
Carol Lowne Board President —
Beverly Voos Board Member —
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member —
Peggy Hall Board Member —
Yvonne Adams Board Member —
Sue Brown Board Member —
Virginia Mills Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 3.6% of Rev
David Harman Board Member 1.8% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.8% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member —
David Mear Treasurer —
Michael Quinn Board Member —
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative —
Alan Lowne Board President —
Carol Lowne Board President —
Beverly Voos Board Member —
Julia Figueras Board Member —
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member —
Peggy Hall Board Member —
Yvonne Adams Board Member —
Sue Brown Board Member —
Virginia Mills Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.