Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 14.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — 4.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 7.2% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 7.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 11.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 9.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 11.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORENE BENSON Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
SCOTT BENSON Board Member 3.3% of Rev
MADELAINE BAADER Board President —
JESSICA EDLER Board President —
JAN VEOMETT Secretary —
ADAM BULL Treasurer —
AARON OUTLAW-WHITE Board Member —
DIANE SANDBERG Board President —
GAETAN WYMAN Board Member —
SHAUN SPEICHER Board Member —
KIM JOSEPH-VOSS Board Member —
WILLIAM KOCHER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORENE BENSON Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
VANESSA GOODWIN Executive Director 3.6% of Rev
SCOTT BENSON Board Member 3.2% of Rev
HELANA BRASLEY Board Member 3.2% of Rev
SANDRA ERB-PETRUCCIONE Board Member —
PAM FERGUSON Board Member —
BEVERLY CONSTANTINO Board Member —
JACK STOVER III Board President —
JENNIFER COLLINS Secretary —
MARGIE WRIGHT Board President —
RICHARD HOLTZBERG Board Member —
HEIDI VAHUE Board Member —
JENNIFER MARGARET WILLIAMSON Board Member —
CATHERINE BARNUM Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORENE BENSON Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
SANDRA ERB-PETRUCCIONE Board Member —
PEG ILARDI Board Member —
PAM FERGUSON Board Member —
BEVERLY CONSTANTINO Board Member —
JACK STOVER III Board President —
JENNIFER COLLINS Secretary —
MARGIE WRIGHT Board President —
RICHARD HOLTZBERG Board Member —
HEIDI VAHUE Board Member —
JENNIFER MARGARET WILLIAMSON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORENE BENSON Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
HELANA BRASLEY Secretary 2.2% of Rev
SANDRA ERB-PETRUCCIONE Board Member —
PEG ILARDI Board Member —
PAM FERGUSON Board President —
BEVERLY CONSTANTINO Board Member —
JACK STOVER III Board Member —
JENNIFER COLLINS Board Member —
MARGIE WRIGHT Board Member —
RICHARD HOLTZBERG Board Member —
HEIDI VAHUE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 71 points below the peer median (0 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.