Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 0.1% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 22.0% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 24.1% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 22.4% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — 18.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 21.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 18.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Tischler Board President 0.0% of Rev
Mark E Lang Board President —
Ceclia M Tyler Treasurer —
K Weinberger Secretary —
Samuel D Clark Board Member —
Eliza Lotozo Board Member —
D Magariel Board Member —
Matthews Given Board Member —
Alison Murphy Board Member —
E Palzere Rae Board Member —
J Sharkey Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gayle Stahlhuth Artistic Director 8.4% of Rev
Mark Edward Lang Graphic Designer 1.2% of Rev
Kathy Mottola Office Assistant 1.2% of Rev
Amanda Brinlee Production Assistant For 27 Weeks 1.0% of Rev
James Rana Production Assistant For 39 Wks 0.9% of Rev
Thomas A Raniszewski Social Media Manager 0.7% of Rev
Michael Mottola Covid Safety Manager For 6 Wks 0.4% of Rev
Lee O'Connor Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Morgan Nichols Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Joan Behr Board Member —
Lynn M Bowlby Board Member —
Samuel Douglas Clark Board Member —
Bernadette J Matthew Board Member —
Alison J Murphy Board Member —
Emma Palzere-Rae Board Member —
Jeff Sharkey Board Member —
Keating Wienberger Board Member —
Daniel Magariel Board Member —
Susan Tischler Board President —
Mark Edward Lang Board President —
Cecilia M Tyler Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gayle Stahlhuth Artistic Director 7.8% of Rev
Lee O'Connor Board Member 1.2% of Rev
Mark Edward Lang Graphic Designer 1.0% of Rev
Thomas A Raniszewski Social Media Manager 0.5% of Rev
Kathy Mottola Office Assistant 0.3% of Rev
Andrew Lofredo Intern For 8 Weeks 0.2% of Rev
Joan Behr Board Member —
Lynn M Bowlby Board Member —
Samuel Douglas Clark Board Member —
Sydia Cedeno Genat Board Member —
Bernadette J Matthew Board Member —
Alison J Murphy Board Member —
Emma Palzere-Rae Board Member —
Jeff Sharkey Board Member —
Keating Wienberger Board Member —
Susan Tischler Board President —
Mark Edward Lang Board President —
Cecilia M Tyler Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 250 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 19 points above the peer median (45 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.