Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 0.1% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 22.0% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 24.1% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 22.4% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 18.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2017 21.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 18.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Tischler Board President 0.0% of Rev
Mark E Lang Board President
Ceclia M Tyler Treasurer
K Weinberger Secretary
Samuel D Clark Board Member
Eliza Lotozo Board Member
D Magariel Board Member
Matthews Given Board Member
Alison Murphy Board Member
E Palzere Rae Board Member
J Sharkey Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gayle Stahlhuth Artistic Director 8.4% of Rev
Mark Edward Lang Graphic Designer 1.2% of Rev
Kathy Mottola Office Assistant 1.2% of Rev
Amanda Brinlee Production Assistant For 27 Weeks 1.0% of Rev
James Rana Production Assistant For 39 Wks 0.9% of Rev
Thomas A Raniszewski Social Media Manager 0.7% of Rev
Michael Mottola Covid Safety Manager For 6 Wks 0.4% of Rev
Lee O'Connor Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Morgan Nichols Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Joan Behr Board Member
Lynn M Bowlby Board Member
Samuel Douglas Clark Board Member
Bernadette J Matthew Board Member
Alison J Murphy Board Member
Emma Palzere-Rae Board Member
Jeff Sharkey Board Member
Keating Wienberger Board Member
Daniel Magariel Board Member
Susan Tischler Board President
Mark Edward Lang Board President
Cecilia M Tyler Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gayle Stahlhuth Artistic Director 7.8% of Rev
Lee O'Connor Board Member 1.2% of Rev
Mark Edward Lang Graphic Designer 1.0% of Rev
Thomas A Raniszewski Social Media Manager 0.5% of Rev
Kathy Mottola Office Assistant 0.3% of Rev
Andrew Lofredo Intern For 8 Weeks 0.2% of Rev
Joan Behr Board Member
Lynn M Bowlby Board Member
Samuel Douglas Clark Board Member
Sydia Cedeno Genat Board Member
Bernadette J Matthew Board Member
Alison J Murphy Board Member
Emma Palzere-Rae Board Member
Jeff Sharkey Board Member
Keating Wienberger Board Member
Susan Tischler Board President
Mark Edward Lang Board President
Cecilia M Tyler Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 19 points above the peer median (45 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.