Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
48
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — 8.3% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 — — 6.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 17.8% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 9.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 6.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 14.8% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 13.4% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 — — 13.3% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 7.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Uys Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
Rossen Milanov Board Member 4.9% of Rev
SUZANNE D WRAY Board Member 3.8% of Rev
Stephanie Wedeking Board President —
Anne VanLent Board President —
Michael Mathews Treasurer —
Nora Duffy Decker Secretary —
Paul H Allen Board Member —
Carol Anderson Board Member —
Marcia Atcheson Board Member —
Derek Bermel Board Member —
Kathleen Biggins Board Member —
Marcia Bossart Board Member —
James Linnehan Board Member —
Julian Grant Board Member —
George Harvey Board Member —
Deborah Herrington Board Member —
B Sue Howard Board Member —
Thomas Lento Board Member —
Anastasia Marty Board Member —
Mark Nurse Board Member —
Costa Papastephanou Board Member —
Elizabeth Pepek Board Member —
Lisa Browne Board Member —
Donald Deieso Board Member —
Pete Taft Board Member —
Benedikt von Schroder Board Member —
Beth Walsh Board Member —
Louise Wellemeyer Board Member —
Yvonne Marcuse Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Uys Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
Rossen Milanov Board Member 3.8% of Rev
Yvonne Marcuse Board President —
Mark Larsen Treasurer —
Deborah Lunder Secretary —
Paul H Allen Board Member —
Carol Anderson Board Member —
Elizabeth B Beers Board Member —
Derek Bermel Board Member —
Kathleen Biggins Board Member —
Nora Duffy Decker Board Member —
John Ellis Board Member —
Deborah Haines Board Member —
Deborah Herrington Board Member —
Anna Horner Board Member —
B Sue Howard Board Member —
Jacqueline Phares Board Member —
Robert N Ridolfi Board Member —
Ruta K Smithson Board Member —
Pete Taft Board Member —
Stephanie Wedeking Board President —
George Harvey Board Member —
Michael Mathews Board Member —
Elizabeth Pepek Board Member —
Beth Walsh Board Member —
Cynthia Hillas Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 34 points above the peer median (60 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 54 → 48 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.