Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 12.7% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 4.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 15.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 5.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 21.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 20.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 21.0% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 19.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 19.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Chandler Executive Director 19.6% of Rev
Kristen Grace Board Member
Rosemary Elliott Board Member
Toni Murdough Board Member
Sara DAprix Board Member
David Zimet Board Member
Ljerka Ukrainczyk Board Member
Alexa Porticella Board Member
Sheila Ossit Board Member
Sue McMaster Board Member
David Kraskow Board President
Jim Grochocinski Secretary
Anna Addario Treasurer
Margot Schoeps Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Chandler Executive Director 18.4% of Rev
Rita Melen Board Member
Sara DAprix Board Member
Ljerka Ukrainczyk Board Member
Sheila Ossit Board Member
Alexa Porticella Board Member
Toni Murdough Board Member
Kristen Grace Board Member
Sarah Cummings Board Member
Dave Kraskow Board President
Anna Addario Treasurer
Jim Grochocinski Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN SPAFFORD Executive Director 13.3% of Rev
SARAH CUMMINGS MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE 1.3% of Rev
KYNAN HORTON THOMAS MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE 0.5% of Rev
DAVID KRASKOW Board President
CHRISTOPHER MORGAN LOY Board President
ANNE ADDARIO Treasurer
JAMES GROCHOCINSKI Secretary
PAUL ACOSTA Board Member
RITA MELEN Board Member
MARGOT SCHOEPS Board President
KARL PAULNACK Board Member
MICHAEL SINICROPI Executive Director
SARAH CHANDLER Executive Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN SPAFFORD Executive Director 10.3% of Rev
SARAH CUMMINGS MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE 0.4% of Rev
KYNAN HORTON THOMAS MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE
DAVID KRASKOW Board President
CHRISTOPHER MORGAN LOY Board President
ANNE ADDARIO Treasurer
JAMES GROCHOCINSKI Secretary
PAUL ACOSTA Board Member
RITA MELEN Board Member
MARGOT SCHOEPS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN SPAFFORD Executive Director 11.4% of Rev
SARAH CUMMINGS MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE 2.0% of Rev
VICTORIA MISKOLCZY MUSICIAN REPRESENTATIVE 0.7% of Rev
RITA MELEN Board Member
PAUL ACOSTA Board Member
JEANNE GODDARD Secretary
JAMES ORCUTT Board President
IAN WOODS Board Member
DAVID KRASKOW Board President
CHRISTOPHER MORGAN LOY Board Member
JAMES GROCHOCINSKI Secretary
ANNE ADDARIO Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.