Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 26.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 22.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 31.7% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 9.6% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 7.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 11.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 11.4% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 11.7% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 14.0% 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 16.3% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 15.9% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALECIA ONEILL Executive Director 27.7% of Rev
ALECIA ONEILL Executive Director 26.0% of Rev
MARY EL EMERSON Board Member
VIRGINIA LEE Board Member
WHITNEY MCCRACKEN Board Member
JOSEPH SKUNDRICH Board Member
DENISE REPPERT Board President
MEGAN MCKOWN Board President
ROY FULLER Treasurer
SARAH GREEN Secretary
JIM BALDWIN Board Member
JONI EATON Board Member
LISA FEIGENBAUM Board Member
ELAINE GENUTE Board Member
GREG LAMONICA Board Member
DENISE REPPERT Board President
ALYSSA CHAWGO Board Member
MEGAN MCKOWN Board President
MARY EL EMERSON Board Member
ROY FULLER Treasurer
VIRGINIA LEE Board Member
SARAH GREEN Secretary
WHITNEY MCCRACKEN Board Member
JIM BALDWIN Board Member
JOSEPH SKUNDRICH Board Member
JONI EATON Board Member
KELLY REPPERT Board Member
LISA FEIGENBAUM Board Member
ELAINE GENUTE Board Member
GREG LAMONICA Board Member
ALYSSA CHAWGO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALECIA ONEILL Executive Director 25.0% of Rev
ANNETTE BURNS Board President
MARY EL EMERSON Board President
JOSEPH SKUNDRICH Treasurer
DENISE REPPERT Secretary
JIM BALDWIN Board Member
SHANNON BELTZ Board Member
MEENA CONANT Board Member
ROY FULLER Board Member
ELAINE GENUTE Board Member
SARAH GREEN Board Member
VIRGINIA LEE Board Member
JOYCE ZUMMO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM BALDWIN Board Member
SHANNON BELTZ Board Member
ANNETTE BURNS Treasurer
MEENA NAIR CONANT Board Member
MARY EL EMERSON VICE PRESIDE
ANNE ENGLISH Board Member
HON MIKE GENUTE Board Member
RICHARD HEIM Board President
REBECCA KAUFMAN Board Member
DENISE REPPERT Secretary
JOSEPH SKUNDRICH Board Member
JOYCE ZUMMO Board Member
ALECIA O'OEILL EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALECIA O'OEILL EXECUTIVE DI 23.9% of Rev
JIM BALDWIN Board Member
ANNETTE BURNS Treasurer
MELISSA DECORDOVA Secretary
MARY EL EMERSON VICE PRESIDE
ANNE ENGLISH Board Member
HON MIKE GENUTE Board Member
RICHARD HEIM Board Member
TJ MOOREHEAD Board Member
DENISE REPPERT Board Member
JOE SKUNDRICH Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.