Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 2.5% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 0.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 1.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 14.8% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 2.3% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 2.9% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 4.5% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — — 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 — — 12.4% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — 17.9% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 — — 0.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 0.6% 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL INTAGLIETTA Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
TAMMY REYES Board President —
LEIGH ANN BENZ Secretary —
JOHN MCGRAW Treasurer —
COLIN LEONARD Board President —
RUTHNIE ANGRAND Board Member —
SAM BARBER Board Member —
STEVE CASE Board Member —
ISABELLE HARRIS Board Member —
RYLAND HEAGERTY Board Member —
NIKITA JANKOWSKI Board Member —
BEN LARSEN Board Member —
AMANDA LEE Board Member —
WILLIS MAHONEY Board Member —
ANNETTE PETERS Board Member —
ROBBY RIGGS Board Member —
KIMILY TORILLO Board Member —
ERIC VINAL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL INTAGLIETTA Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
ANDY BREUER Board President —
KRISTY BRIGHTMAN Secretary —
TAMMY REYES Treasurer —
COLIN LEONARD Board President —
RUTHNIE ANGRAND Board Member —
LEIGH ANN BOATMAN BENZ Board Member —
GUY VAN BAALEN Board Member —
ISABELLE HARRIS Board Member —
ANNETTE PETERS Board Member —
KIMILY TORILLO Board Member —
STEVE CASE Board Member —
BEN LARSEN Board Member —
JOHN MCGRAW Board Member —
ERIC VINAL Board Member —
WILLS MAHONEY Board Member —
AMANDA LEE Board Member —
ROBBY RIGGS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL INTAGLIETTA Executive Director 2.2% of Rev
ANDY BREUER Board President —
KRISTY BRIGHTMAN Secretary —
TAMMY REYES Treasurer —
COLIN LEONARD Board President —
RUTHNIE ANGRAND Board Member —
LEIGH ANN BOATMAN BENZ Board Member —
GUY VAN BAALEN Board Member —
WILLIAM FISHER Board Member —
ISABELLE HARRIS Board Member —
ANNETTE PETERS Board Member —
KIMILY TORILLO Board Member —
STEVE CASE Board Member —
BEN LARSEN Board Member —
JOHN MCGRAW Board Member —
ERIC VINAL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.