Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 38.7% 47 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sue On Artistic Director 18.9% of Rev
Pam Heinrich Executive Director 14.4% of Rev
Kevin McAllister Accounting Manager 5.3% of Rev
Charles Halpin Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIELLE WILSON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR
LAURA NIFENECKER Treasurer
PAM HEINRICH Board President
KIM TRINH Secretary
CAROL MEISELES Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIELLE WILSON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR
LAURA NIFENECKER Treasurer
PAM HEINRICH Board President
KIM TRINH Secretary
CAROL MEISELES Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points above the peer median (75 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 38.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~33 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.