Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karey Bacon Board President
Jennie Walsh Board President
Richard P Myers Treasurer
Jess Purvis Secretary
Barbara Adolphe Board Member
Ian Brehm Board Member
Vincent Budnick Board Member
Kirsten Erwin Board Member
Jonathan Sills Board Member
Adlai Waksman Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karey Bacon Board President
Phillip Baumgarten Board President
Jessalyn Purvis Secretary
Richard Myers Treasurer
Laura Alexander Board Member
Ian Brehm Board Member
Vincent Budnick Board Member
Patricia Buchmann Board Member
Jonathan Sills Board Member
Adlai Waksman Board Member
Jennifer Walsh Board Member
Mark Moore Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (65 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.