Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
62
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 62 Stable Stable Watch
2023 — — — 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 58 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elaine Crane Board President —
Charles Crane Vice President —
Carol Ratbun Treasurer —
Jonathan LaBarre Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elaine Crane Board President —
Charles Crane Vice President —
Carol Ratbun Treasurer —
Jonathan LaBarre Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elaine Crane Board President —
Charles Crane Vice President —
Carol Ratbun Treasurer —
Jonathan LaBarre Secretary —
Elaine Crane Board President —
Charles Crane Vice President —
Carol Ratbun Treasurer —
Jonathan LaBarre Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
62 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points above the peer median (100 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.