Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 41.2% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 36.5% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 43.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael R Licona Executive Director 20.5% of Rev
Debra K Licona Treasurer 20.0% of Rev
Bill Pratt Chairman
Sarma Velamuri Board Member
Eric Johnson Board Member
Jonathan Kendall Board Member
Lynda Dean Board Member
Sharon Elander Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael R Licona Executive Director 20.5% of Rev
Debra K Licona Treasurer 20.0% of Rev
Lynda Dean Board Member
Bill Pratt Chairman
Sarma Velamuri Board Member
Eric Johnson Board Member
Jonathan Kendall Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael R Licona Executive Director 22.9% of Rev
Debra K Licona Treasurer 20.0% of Rev
Bill Pratt Chairman
Sarma Velamuri Board Member
Eric Johnson Board Member
Jonathan Kendall Board Member
Lynda Dean Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in GA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 65.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.