Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Clark Board Member —
Maria Sundquist Board Member —
Karen Hoff Board Member —
Charles Hannon Board Member —
Paige DeGirolamo Board Member —
Sharon Dow Secretary —
Robert MacRobbie Treasurer —
Dylan Torchinsky Board President —
Melissa Ehlers Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Clark Board Member —
Maria Sundquist Board Member —
Karen Hoff Board Member —
Charles Hannon Board Member —
Paige DeGirolamo Board Member —
Sharon Dow Secretary —
Kate Beattie Board Member —
Alyssa Branciforte Board Member —
Melissa Elhers Board President —
Robert MacRobbie Treasurer —
Dylan Torchinsky Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Elhers Board President —
Robert MacRobbie Treasurer —
Dylan Torchinsky Board President —
Sarah Clark Board Member —
Maria Sundquist Board Member —
Karen Hoff Board Member —
Kate Beattie Board Member —
Charles Hannon Board Member —
Paige DeGirolamo Board Member —
Alysaa Branciforte Board Member —
Sharon Dow Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Cole Beckwith Board Member —
Maria Sundquist Board Member —
Sarah Clark Board Member —
Karen Hoff Board Member —
Kate Beattie Board Member —
Charles Hannon Board Member —
Dylan Turner Board Member —
Michael Molineaux Board Member —
Alysaa Branciforte Board Member —
Robert MacRobbie Treasurer —
Melissa Elhers Board President —
Sharon Dow Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points below the peer median (30 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.