Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.2% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 3.8% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 13.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 17.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 18.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 23.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 21.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 — — 21.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 13.4% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board Member —
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member —
JOHN CORRARO Board President —
MICHELE PICCOLO Board Member —
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member —
GEOFF KANNER Treasurer —
KIM BURKHART Board Member —
JUSTIN LACOURSIERE Board Member —
MARY SUE FEIGE Secretary —
DIANE BYRON Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 11.5% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President —
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member —
JOHN CORRARO Board President —
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary —
KEN NAPPI Board Member —
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member —
LORI MCKEON Treasurer —
DIANE BYRON Board President —
KIM BURKHART Board Member —
GEOFF KANNER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 3.5% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President —
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member —
KATHY RIDDLE Board Member —
JOHN CORRARO Board President —
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary —
KEN NAPPI Board Member —
RICK BELDEN Board Member —
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member —
JODI DAWLEY Board Member —
FRAN LEONARD Board Member —
LORI MCKEON Treasurer —
DIANE BYRON Board President —
KIM BURKHART Board Member —
GEOFF KANNER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTIN MARCHITTO Executive Director 8.8% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President —
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member —
MARILYN CORMACK Board Member —
SUSAN MAURIELLO Board Member —
KATHY RIDDLE Board President —
JOHN CORRARO Board President —
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary —
KEN NAPPI Board Member —
RICK BELDEN Board Member —
ERNESTINE LOUISE Board Member —
MARGARET MIKAN Board Member —
SEAN SULLIVAN Treasurer —
JODI DAWLEY Board Member —
FRAN LEONARD Board Member —
LORI MCKEON Board Member —
DIANE BYRON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (0 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.