Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 36 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID WEIL Board President —
SHERRY ARCHIBALD Board Member —
EMILY WEIL Board Member —
ROBERT CRENSHAW VICE PRESIDE —
SUSAN CRENSHAW Board Member —
JIM GRANT Board Member —
GEOFF HULSE Board Member —
DAWN AMORY Secretary —
ADAM TWISS Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID WEIL Board President —
SHERRY ARCHIBALD Board Member —
EMILY WEIL VICE PRESIDE —
ROBERT CRENSHAW Board Member —
SUSAN CRENSHAW Board Member —
JIM GRANT Board Member —
GEOFF HULSE Board Member —
ADAM TWISS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM GRANT Board Member —
GEOFF HULSE Board Member —
DAVID WEIL Board President —
SHERRY ARCHIBALD Board Member —
EMILY WEIL VICE PRESIDE —
ROBERT CRENSHAW Board Member —
SUSAN CRENSHAW Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID WEIL Board President —
SHERRY ARCHIBALD Board Member —
EMILY WEIL VICE PRESIDE —
ROBERT CRENSHAW Board Member —
SUSAN CRENSHAW Board Member —
JIM GRANT Board Member —
GEOFF HULSE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID WEIL Board President —
SHERRY ARCHIBALD Board Member —
EMILY WEIL VICE PRESIDE —
ROBERT CRENSHAW Board Member —
SUSAN CRENSHAW Board Member —
STEPHANIE SLUSSER Board Member —
GEOFF HULSE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 32 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 25 points below the peer median (50 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.