Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score
Institutional Epochs
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUGH BIALECKI | Board President | — | ||
| LARRY ZAMORA | Board President | — | ||
| WAYNE AUSTIN | Treasurer | — | ||
| MARY LINDSEY | Secretary | — | ||
| LORI SEMENIUK | Board Member | — | ||
| DEE ZAMORA | Board Member | — | ||
| JIMMY FOSTER | Board Member | — | ||
| DESTINY LOVE | Board Member | — | ||
| GAVIN BIALECKI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTINE LEVISTER | Board President | — | ||
| HUGH BIALECKI | Board President | — | ||
| WAYNE AUSTIN | Treasurer | — | ||
| LORI SEMENIUK | Secretary | — | ||
| ERNEST LEVISTER | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY LINDSEY | Board Member | — | ||
| KEITH MARTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA MARTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| GAVIN BIALECKI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARY LINDSEY | Board Member | — | ||
| KEITH MARTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA MARTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| CHRIS LEVISTER | Board President | — | ||
| HUGH BIALECKI | Board President | — | ||
| WAYNE AUSTIN | Treasurer | — | ||
| LORI SEMENIUK | Secretary | — | ||
| ERNEST LEVISTER | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.