Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.0% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 7.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 8.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 2.8% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 6.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 7.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 7.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 8.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 8.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY PECK EXECUTIVE DI 5.7% of Rev
REENA KASHYAP SEE SCHEDULE O Board Member 0.2% of Rev
ROBIN HENSCHEL SEE SCHEDULE O Secretary 0.1% of Rev
SALLY NG SEE SCHEDULE O VICE PRESIDE 0.0% of Rev
VALERIE CALLOWAY Board Member
MICHAEL CARTER Board Member
CAROL CHEVLOWE Board President
CLAIRE COHEN Board Member
EARLENE HARDIE COX Board Member
ROSE FOLEY Secretary
PATRICK HANKIN Board Member
ROBERT KLEIN Board Member
LAURA MACKENZIE Board Member
EMMA MCKEE Board Member
JOE ORLANDO Treasurer
DIANA SANTAMARIA-CLAY Secretary
JUDITH WEBER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY PECK Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
ROBIN HENSCHELSEE SCH O Board Member 0.1% of Rev
REENA KASHYAP SEE SCH O Board Member 0.0% of Rev
EARLENE HARDIE COX SEE SCH O Board Member 0.0% of Rev
CAROL CHEVLOWE Board President
SALLY NG-BRIGGS Board President
JOE ORLANDO Treasurer
ROSE FOLEY Secretary
SCOTT BEDRICK Board Member
JUDITH WEBER Board Member
CAROLE SIEGEL PHD Board Member
LINDA SOLOMON Board Member
KATHERINE KERN Board Member
ROBERT KLEIN Board Member
MICHELE ORAM Board Member
DIANA SANTAMARIA-CLAY Board Member
VALERIE CALLOWAY Board Member
PATRICK HANKIN Board Member
LAURA MACKENZIE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY PECK Executive Director 0.9% of Rev
ROBIN HENSCHELSEE SCH O Board Member 0.4% of Rev
REENA KASHYAP SEE SCH O Board Member 0.3% of Rev
JUDITH WEBER SEE SCH O Board Member 0.2% of Rev
SALLY NG-BRIGGS SEE SCH O Board President 0.1% of Rev
CAROL CHEVLOWE Board President
EARLENE HARDIE COX Board Member
ROSE FOLEY Secretary
SCOTT BEDRICK Board Member
CAROLE SIEGEL PHD Board Member
LINDA SOLOMON Board Member
KATHERINE KERN Board Member
ROBERT KLEIN Board Member
MICHELE ORAM Board Member
JOE ORLANDO Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 40 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.