Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 57.7% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 27.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 9.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 3.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 3.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 3.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 4.0% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 4.2% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bora Koknar Board Member 20.6% of Rev
Alika U Spencer-Koknar Board Member 18.2% of Rev
Justine N Lauren-Bechler Board Member 13.5% of Rev
Kimberly Wadycki Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Jenny Hollingworth Executive Director
John Hamilton Treasurer
Lisa Burton Guevara Secretary
Lance Huntley Board Member
Katie Martin Board Member
Randi Randle Board Member
Hylton Edingfield Board Member
Corinne Kason Board Member
Austin Barnes Board Members
Hedy Flores Board Members
Robert Casillas Board Member
Robyn Ginsburg Board President
Brandon Lewke Treasurer
Camille Walker Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 19 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.