Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
28
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 39.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE BIRRER Treasurer
STEPHANIE CAPPS VICE PRESIDE
LAURA HUCKIN Artistic Director
BETH STROMBERG Board President
CAROL HARVEY Secretary
HALEY ROSS Board Member
ANGELA JORDAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA HUCKIN Artistic Director 39.2% of Rev
JULIE BIRRER Treasurer
STEPHANIE CAPPS VICE PRESIDE
BETH STROMBERG Board President
CAROL HARVEY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 14 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (10 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.