Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 3.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 4.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DENNIS YATES Board President —
BINTI BAILEY VICE PRESIDE —
NIEL THOMAS INTERIM SECR —
DARREN HAMILTON Treasurer —
DAVID TURNER Treasurer —
PAM LIVINGSTON Board Member —
JESSE YODER Board Member —
KEVIN FENNER Board Member —
BILL SCHALLENBERG Board Member —
PEGGY KENT Board Member —
HEATHER HAMILTON Board Member —
JIM MONK Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DENNIS YATES Board President —
BINTI BAILEY VICE PRESIDE —
TERRY RYAN Secretary —
DAVID TURNER Treasurer —
PAUL KOEHLER Board Member —
NEIL THOMAS Board Member —
KEVIN FENNER Board Member —
HEATHER HAMILTON Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEL GIMPEL Board President —
DENNIS YATES VICE-PRESIDE —
SHARON CANNON Treasurer —
TERRY RYAN Secretary —
DAVID TURNER Board Member —
PAUL KOEHLER Board Member —
DANIEL SCHERMER Board Member —
BINTI BAILEY Board Member —
NEIL THOMAS Board Member —
KEVIN FENNER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHARON CANNON Treasurer 0.9% of Rev
LORI HUFF 7120-12120 Secretary 0.7% of Rev
JOEL GIMPEL Board President 0.3% of Rev
KARL LIZZA VICE-PRESIDE 0.3% of Rev
SUSANELLA NOBLE 7120-5121 Board Member 0.3% of Rev
DENNIS YATES 4121-6121 VICE-PRESIDE —
BINTI BAILEY 12120-6121 Secretary —
COLLEEN WHITTY Board Member —
PAUL KOEHLER Board Member —
DANIEL SCHERMER Board Member —
TERRY RYAN 4121-6121 Board Member —
DELPHINA MILLER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHARON CANNON Board Member 1.6% of Rev
JOEL GIMPEL FROM 21420 Board President 1.1% of Rev
SUSANELLA NOBLE Board Member 1.0% of Rev
KARL LIZZA FROM 1120 Secretary 0.7% of Rev
JOANNE TURNER Board Member 0.6% of Rev
KEVIN FENNER 7119 - 21320 Board President —
DANIEL SCHERMER Treasurer —
DAVID TURNER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 47 other orgs in HI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (5 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.